Questo sito usa cookie di analytics per raccogliere dati in forma aggregata e cookie di terze parti per migliorare l'esperienza utente.
Leggi l'Informativa Cookie Policy completa.

Libri antichi e moderni

Mcleod, Glenda & Charity Cannon Willard

THE VISION OF CHRISTINE DE PIZAN Translated from the French. Very Good with no dust jacket

D. S. Brewer, 2005

80,00 €

Ancient World Books Bookshop

(Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

Parla con il Libraio

Metodi di Pagamento

Dettagli

Anno di pubblicazione
2005
ISBN
1843840588
Autore
Mcleod, Glenda & Charity Cannon Willard
Editori
D. S. Brewer
Soggetto
Medieval Mediaeval Women's Studies French Studies
Descrizione
Very Good with no dust jacket
Descrizione
Hardcover ISBN 1843840588

Descrizione

A small puncture mark at the lower back joint. Ex-library copy with usual stamps, and pocket though I believe this was never in circulation. ; The Library of Medieval Women; 0.94 x 8.43 x 5.59 Inches; 199 pages; Christine de Pizan (also seen as de Pisan) (1364–1430) was a writer and analyst of the medieval era who strongly challenged the clerical misogyny and stereotypes that were prevalent in the male-dominated realm of the arts. De Pizan completed forty-one pieces during her thirty-year career (1399–1429). She earned her accolade as Europe’s first professional woman writer (Redfern 74). Her success stems from a wide range of innovative writing and rhetorical techniques that critically challenged renowned male writers such as Jean de Meun who, to Pizan’s dismay, incorporated misogynist beliefs within their literary works. In recent decades, de Pizan's work has been returned to prominence by the efforts of scholars such as Charity Cannon Willard and Earl Jeffrey Richards. Certain scholars have argued that she should be seen as an early feminist who efficiently used language to convey that women could play an important role within society, although this characterisation has been challenged by other critics who claim either that it is an anachronistic use of the word, or that her beliefs were not progressive enough to merit such a designation (Richards 1-2).